Criteria for Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) for Retirement Plans

Criteria for Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) for Retirement Plans

Introduction

In the context of U.S. qualified retirement plans, identifying a Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) is critical for compliance with IRS nondiscrimination rules. HCE designation affects contribution limits, plan testing, and overall retirement plan administration, ensuring that benefits do not disproportionately favor top earners over rank-and-file employees.

Definition of Highly Compensated Employee

According to the IRS, an HCE is an employee who meets either of the following criteria:

  1. Ownership Test
    • The employee owns more than 5% of the business at any time during the current or preceding year, regardless of compensation.
  2. Compensation Test
    • The employee earned more than a threshold compensation amount in the preceding year.
    • For 2025, the IRS defines this threshold as $150,000.
    • Employers may apply a plan-specific look-back period of one year to determine HCE status.

Note on Family Attribution

  • Ownership percentages include family attribution rules, meaning stock owned by spouses, children, parents, or other related individuals may count toward the 5% threshold.

Key Implications for Retirement Plans

1. Nondiscrimination Testing

Qualified plans, such as 401(k)s and profit-sharing plans, must satisfy nondiscrimination rules to ensure that benefits and contributions do not disproportionately favor HCEs:

  • Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) Test
    • Compares deferral rates of HCEs to non-HCEs in 401(k) plans.
  • Actual Contribution Percentage (ACP) Test
    • Measures employer matching contributions for HCEs versus non-HCEs.
  • Top-Heavy Testing
    • Determines if key employees, including HCEs, hold more than 60% of plan assets, triggering minimum contributions for non-key employees.

2. Contribution Limits

  • HCEs may be subject to corrective actions if nondiscrimination tests fail, such as:
    • Refund of excess contributions
    • Increased employer contributions to non-HCEs

3. Plan Design Considerations

  • Employers may design plans with safe harbor provisions, automatically satisfying nondiscrimination rules and allowing HCEs to maximize contributions without corrective adjustments.
  • Safe Harbor 401(k) options include mandatory employer contributions or matching formulas that meet IRS requirements.

Example: Determining HCE Status

EmployeeOwnership %Compensation 2024HCE Status
John Smith3%$160,000Yes
Mary Johnson6%$120,000Yes
Robert Lee2%$140,000No
  • John Smith exceeds the compensation threshold ($150,000) → HCE
  • Mary Johnson exceeds the 5% ownership threshold → HCE
  • Robert Lee does not meet either threshold → Not HCE

Strategic Considerations for Employers

  • Monitor Compensation Changes: Annual review ensures correct HCE classification for plan testing.
  • Plan Design: Utilize safe harbor provisions to reduce testing burdens and allow HCEs to contribute fully.
  • Communication: Educate employees about contribution limits and potential corrective distributions if tests fail.
  • Documentation: Maintain records of compensation, ownership, and family attribution for compliance audits.

Conclusion

The IRS defines a Highly Compensated Employee based on ownership and compensation thresholds, with significant implications for qualified retirement plan compliance. Accurate identification of HCEs is essential to conduct nondiscrimination testing, design compliant plans, and ensure equitable benefit distribution between highly compensated and rank-and-file employees. Proper monitoring, plan design, and documentation help employers maintain compliance while maximizing retirement benefits for all employees.

Scroll to Top