As a finance professional, I often analyze how institutional investors manage their portfolios. One key concept that stands out is asset allocation by funded status—a dynamic strategy that adjusts investment risk based on whether a pension plan or endowment is overfunded or underfunded. This approach balances growth and security, ensuring long-term sustainability.
Table of Contents
Understanding Funded Status
The funded status of a pension plan or endowment measures the ratio of its assets to its liabilities. For a pension plan, liabilities are future benefit payments owed to retirees. For an endowment, liabilities represent spending obligations to support institutions like universities or charities.
The funded ratio (FR) is calculated as:
FR = \frac{A}{L}Where:
- A = Market value of assets
- L = Present value of liabilities
A funded ratio above 100% means the plan is overfunded, while below 100% indicates underfunded.
Why Asset Allocation Should Depend on Funded Status
Traditional asset allocation follows a static approach—say, 60% stocks and 40% bonds—regardless of market conditions or liability changes. However, this can be inefficient. A better method is dynamic asset allocation, where investment risk adjusts based on funded status.
The Case for Dynamic Allocation
- Risk Management for Underfunded Plans – If a plan is underfunded, taking excessive equity risk could worsen deficits during market downturns.
- Capital Preservation for Overfunded Plans – Overfunded plans may reduce risk to lock in gains and avoid slipping into underfunded status.
- Liability-Driven Investing (LDI) – Aligning assets with liabilities reduces volatility in funded status.
A Framework for Asset Allocation by Funded Status
I propose a strategic approach where asset allocation shifts based on the funded ratio. Below is a simplified model:
| Funded Ratio (%) | Equity Allocation (%) | Fixed Income (%) | Alternatives (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 80 | 40 | 50 | 10 |
| 80 – 100 | 60 | 30 | 10 |
| > 100 | 30 | 60 | 10 |
Table 1: Sample Asset Allocation Based on Funded Status
How This Works in Practice
Example 1: Underfunded Plan (FR = 70%)
- Problem: High liabilities require growth but with controlled risk.
- Solution: 40% equities (for growth), 50% bonds (for stability), and 10% alternatives (for diversification).
Example 2: Overfunded Plan (FR = 120%)
- Problem: Protecting surplus is more important than aggressive growth.
- Solution: 30% equities (reduced risk), 60% bonds (income and stability), and 10% alternatives (inflation hedge).
Mathematical Justification: The Optimal Glide Path
Research by Sharpe (1976) and Merton (2014) suggests that plans should adjust risk based on funding levels. A common model uses a glide path, where equity exposure decreases as funded status improves.
The optimal equity allocation (E) can be expressed as:
E = E_{max} \times \left(1 - \frac{FR - FR_{min}}{FR_{max} - FR_{min}}\right)Where:
- E_{max} = Maximum equity allocation (e.g., 60%)
- FR_{min} = Minimum acceptable funded ratio (e.g., 70%)
- FR_{max} = Target funded ratio (e.g., 110%)
Applying the Formula
Suppose:
- E_{max} = 60\%
- FR_{min} = 70\%
- FR_{max} = 110\%
For a plan with FR = 90\%:
E = 60\% \times \left(1 - \frac{90 - 70}{110 - 70}\right) = 60\% \times (1 - 0.5) = 30\%This suggests a conservative 30% equity allocation at a 90% funded ratio.
Real-World Challenges
While this approach is theoretically sound, real-world implementation faces hurdles:
- Market Volatility – Funded status fluctuates daily with asset values and interest rates.
- Regulatory Constraints – Pension plans must comply with ERISA and IRS funding rules.
- Behavioral Biases – Boards may resist reducing equity exposure even when overfunded.
Case Study: Corporate Pension Plans Post-2008
After the 2008 financial crisis, many corporate pensions saw funded ratios plummet. Those that de-risked early (e.g., locking in bonds at high yields) recovered faster. A 2015 Milliman study found that plans adopting dynamic allocation strategies improved funded status by 15% more than static approaches over a decade.
Key Takeaways
- Dynamic Beats Static – Adjusting asset allocation based on funded status improves long-term stability.
- LDI is Critical – Hedging liabilities with long-duration bonds reduces risk.
- Monitor Frequently – Funded status should be reviewed quarterly to adjust allocations.
Final Thoughts
Asset allocation by funded status is not just theoretical—it’s a practical strategy that enhances financial resilience. Whether managing a corporate pension or a university endowment, aligning investments with liabilities ensures sustainability. By adopting a dynamic approach, institutional investors can navigate market cycles while meeting long-term obligations.
