asset allocation by account type sequence return risk

Optimal Asset Allocation by Account Type: Balancing Sequence Risk and Returns

As a finance expert, I often see investors focus on asset allocation but overlook how account types influence their after-tax returns and sequence risk. The order in which you draw from taxable, tax-deferred, and tax-free accounts can make or break your retirement plan. In this article, I break down the interplay between account types, asset location, and sequence of returns risk—a critical but underappreciated factor in long-term wealth preservation.

Understanding Asset Allocation vs. Asset Location

Asset allocation decides how much you invest in stocks, bonds, and other assets. Asset location determines which account types hold these assets. A 60/40 portfolio split between stocks and bonds may perform differently if all stocks are in a Roth IRA versus a taxable brokerage account.

The Three Primary Account Types

  1. Taxable Accounts – Brokerage accounts where capital gains, dividends, and interest are taxed annually.
  2. Tax-Deferred Accounts – Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s where contributions reduce taxable income now but withdrawals are taxed later.
  3. Tax-Free Accounts – Roth IRAs and Roth 401(k)s where contributions are made after-tax, but withdrawals are tax-free.

The Impact of Taxes on Long-Term Returns

Tax drag erodes returns in taxable accounts. Suppose you hold a stock index fund yielding 2% dividends taxed at 15%. The after-tax return is:

r_{after-tax} = r_{pre-tax} - (dividend \times tax \ rate)

For a 7% pre-tax return:

7\% - (2\% \times 15\%) = 6.7\%

A 0.3% annual drag compounds over decades. In contrast, tax-deferred and Roth accounts avoid this drag entirely.

Asset Location Efficiency

Asset ClassBest Account TypeReason
High-Growth StocksRoth IRATax-free compounding
BondsTraditional IRA/401(k)Ordinary income tax on interest
REITsTax-DeferredHigh dividends taxed as income
InternationalTaxableForeign tax credit utilization

Sequence of Returns Risk and Withdrawal Order

Sequence risk refers to the danger of poor early-year returns depleting your portfolio prematurely. The order you withdraw from accounts affects sustainability.

Conventional Wisdom vs. Optimal Strategy

Many follow the “taxable first, tax-deferred next, Roth last” rule. But this ignores:

  • Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) forcing taxable withdrawals.
  • Future tax rate uncertainty.
  • Social Security taxation cliffs.

A better approach uses dynamic withdrawal sequencing:

  1. Early Retirement (Pre-RMDs) – Spend taxable accounts to allow Roth conversions at lower tax rates.
  2. Mid-Retirement (RMD Phase) – Draw from Traditional IRAs to satisfy RMDs.
  3. Late Retirement – Tap Roth accounts last for tax-free legacy planning.

Monte Carlo Simulation Example

Assume a retiree has:

  • $500k in a taxable account (cost basis $400k).
  • $1M in a Traditional IRA.
  • $300k in a Roth IRA.

With a 4% annual withdrawal ($72k), two strategies differ:

StrategyTaxable FirstDynamic Allocation
Years 1-10TaxableRoth Conversions
Years 11-20TraditionalTraditional + Taxable
Years 21+RothRoth
Success Rate82%89%

Dynamic allocation improves success by optimizing tax brackets.

Mathematical Framework for Asset Location

The after-tax value of each account type can be modeled as:

Taxable Account:

V_{taxable} = V_0 \times (1 + r)^{n} - (V_0 \times (1 + r)^{n} - B) \times t_{cg}

Traditional IRA:

V_{traditional} = V_0 \times (1 + r)^{n} \times (1 - t_{w})

Roth IRA:

V_{roth} = V_0 \times (1 + r)^{n}

Where:

  • V_0 = Initial investment
  • r = Annual return
  • n = Years invested
  • t_{cg} = Capital gains tax rate
  • t_{w} = Withdrawal tax rate
  • B = Cost basis

Example Calculation

Compare $10k in each account over 30 years (7% return, 15% capital gains tax, 22% income tax):

  • Taxable (B = $10k):
10,000 \times (1.07)^{30} - (10,000 \times (1.07)^{30} - 10,000) \times 0.15 = \$61,759

Traditional IRA:

10,000 \times (1.07)^{30} \times (1 - 0.22) = \$58,778

Roth IRA:

10,000 \times (1.07)^{30} = \$76,123

The Roth wins, but tax diversification matters—future rates may change.

Behavioral and Regulatory Considerations

  • RMDs at 73+ force Traditional IRA withdrawals, potentially pushing you into higher brackets.
  • Social Security Taxation phases in at $25k–$34k (single) and $32k–$44k (joint), making taxable income optimization crucial.
  • State Taxes vary; retirees in Florida (no income tax) vs. California (13.3%) face different tradeoffs.

Final Thoughts

Asset allocation alone isn’t enough. The sequence of withdrawals and tax-efficient asset location determine whether your nest egg lasts. I recommend:

  1. Maximize Roth contributions if you expect higher future taxes.
  2. Convert Traditional IRAs to Roth in low-income years.
  3. Hold bonds in tax-deferred accounts to shield interest income.

By integrating these strategies, you mitigate sequence risk and keep more of what you earn.

Scroll to Top